Science online, sleep deprivation and sugar edition

Sugar Cubes Sure, it’s not good for you, but is sugar toxic? Photo by howzey.
  • This week, at Nothing in Biology Makes Sense! A guest post calls for escalation in the “arms race” against aggressive mimics in scholarly publishing. And I picked a fight with a Canadian nerd-rapper.
  • Which is more relentless? A new study projects climate change will happen way too fast for vertebrate animals to adapt; but see my take at The Molecular Ecologist.
  • In evolution, and in scientific thought. Reflections on the importance of founder effects.
  • Satisfying the grasshopper and the ant? Cities that plan to prevent—and mitigate—climate change reap short-term benefits, too.
  • Depends what you mean by “toxin,” of course. Is it appropriate to call sugar a toxin?
  • For future reference. The WEIRDness of evolutionary psychology, quantified.
  • I mean, really. Preferring non-science over science for aesthetic reasons is just kind of embarrassing.
  • Let me get back to you on that. Does the self-correcting paradigm of science move too slowly?
  • Vicious cycle. If you lose sleep because you’re worried about something, sleep deprivation will make the axiety worse.
  • Men can still wear whatever they were wearing when they rolled out of bed. How women can dress for success in academia.
  • And it’s not getting better. Handgun safety is a public health problem.
  • Proof-of-concept, anyway. Silencing an entire extra chromosome to cure Down’s Syndrome.

Science online, electrostatic bollocks edition

fog 5 - spiderweb spiral Some web? Photo by feral godmother.

Science online: Glorious Fifth edition

2013.06.24 - Wildflower IV Photo by jby.
  • Again. In which bad science in the service of sexism gets its comeuppance.
  • There is a whole blog about corvids. And they know how to pull tails.
  • Guys, there are taste receptors on your balls. And also on a lot of other parts of your body, apparently.
  • “Wait … these lionfish are overweight?” The invasion of lionfish is so bad that the fish are obese.
  • Leprosy is, evolutionarily, mighty stable. What was discovered by sequencing bacterial DNA from the bones of 14th-century lepers.
  • Mendel v. Fisher. Why scientists screw up, and why the solution is more science.
  • The dot’s barely even blue. Earth, photographed in extreme not-close-up.
  • ““To do science is to search for repeated patterns, not simply to accumulate facts …” Reading Robert MacArthur’s Geographical Ecology.
  • New bird species discovered! In the suburbs of Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
  • Like burning down the forest and replanting it to kill off some weeds, but still. Bone marrow transplants appear to have eliminated HIV infections in two more patients.
  • This’ll come in handy. Teaching evolution through the lens of infectious disease.
  • Sure, the paper’s retracted … but who’s got the movie rights? The story of a retracted Nature paper involves break-ins, tampering with experimental material, and hidden cameras.

Science online, on the way to #Evol2013 edition

Granular Poison Dart Frog There’s more than one way to be a successful granular poison frog. Photo by brian.gratwicke.

Science online, through a panopticon darkly edition

Barack Obama in Charlottesville—August 29th Photo by BarackObama.com.

Science online, the wrong kind of fan mail edition

Iguana Paleo-dieting Hiwi-style? Hope you like roast iguana. Photo by christophedemulder.

Science online, on the road edition

2006.06.19 - departure lounge Barnacles. Photo by jby.

Science online, where no one has gone before edition

To the best of my knowledge, Spock never scanned sushi. Image via Frankie’s Soapbox.

Science online: Opening lab closets everywhere edition

weather Do we have enough time to teach conservatives about climate science before the storm hits? Photo by oldbilluk.

Holy poop! Scicurious is pseudonymous no more

Super-blogger Scicurious is taking off the mask. Metaphorically speaking.

Her full statement is over at her Scientific American blog.

I’ve known Scicurious as an Internet friend for years now, even met her at ScienceOnline, and gone running with her, and I never knew “real” name. She was totally cool about the use of the pseudonym, politely but firmly protective of her other identity. But it’s still very nice to meet Bethany Brookshire. It feels, just a little bit, like she’s come out of … well, maybe not the closet. Some sort of smaller-than-necessary, confining space with opaque walls. Er.

Anyway: Congratulations, Bethany! It turns out that I love your work.◼